Speech of Deputy Governor Wu Xiaoling
Delivered at the Annual Conference of Real
Estate Finance In China”
November 5, 2005
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Good morning. It is my great pleasure to attend the
“Annual Conference of Real Estate Finance in China,
2005”. I would like to take this platform to make a few comments on real estate
finance.
All industries and enterprises are in need of
financing, with the real estate industry being only one of them. However, the
financing issue of other industries is rarely talked about while financing for
the real estate industry has become a hot topic for wide discussions. Why is
that? I think basically there are three reasons behind it.
First, the real estate industry concerns people’s
living conditions. To live and work in peace and contentment are the two
important preconditions for a harmonious society. The possession of a house ensures
the basic life of the people; whether living in a good and comfortable
environment concerns the living quality of people. Therefore, the housing
policy and the development policy of the real estate industry concerns the
achievement of the social development objective, which shall be one of the
critical connotations for a well-off society.
Second, the real estate industry enjoys a relatively
long industrial chain and promotes the economic development greatly. The
economy in China is in a phase of transformation and
transition. The commercialization of housing and the urbanization of rural
areas are exactly the processes in which the development of the real estate
industry and that of other industries are mutually re-enforced. Consequently,
the real estate industry shall be one of the pillar industries in national
economic development for quite a long period in the future.
Third, the development of the real estate industry
concerns national interest and people’s livelihood. However, the productive
cycle of real estate is so long that there is a process from the emergence of intensive
demand for funds until the final payments made by the consumers. Such a
mismatch can also be regarded as the timing difference between the demand for and
supply of funds, which is a financial issue for sure.
It is the special social and economic role played by
the real estate industry and the urgency regarding the financing of the real
estate industry that have aroused people’s particular interest in the real
estate finance.
Real estate finance definitely does not refer to real
estate credit only. It covers all the financing modes utilized for the
development of the real estate industry such as equity financing, bond
financing, credit financing and trust financing. Like the development of other
commodity markets, the development of China’s housing
market must resolve the problems of final effective market demands and the
demand for capital in the process of commodity production. The availability of
working capital in the process of commodity production depends on whether the
final effective demands exist.
In my opinion, the problems of the current real estate
finance in China do not mainly revolve on the credit policy
for the real estate industry, instead they include the following 2 issues:
first, there is not a risk separation mechanism in shape for the financing
modes of the real estate industry. Most of the risks are concentrated in banks;
second, the housing monetarization reform has not been completed yet. We are
still lacking an appropriate solution that shall properly deal with the
relationship between carrying out the housing monetarization reform and
ensuring the basic living standard of the general public. This leads to some
problems yet to be resolved in respect of income allocation, which shall have a
negative impact on the effective demands for housing commodities. The former
belongs to financial policy issues, while the latter belongs to housing policy
and income allocation policy issues, but the latter has great impact on the
safety of financial activities. We shall analyze the effective demands in the
market as well as the effectiveness of various financing modes given the status
quo of income allocation.
We shall make research on the real estate finance in
terms of the match between risk and return.
The real estate industry is a capital intensive
industry. Prior to World War II in the 20th century, the real estate
market in various European and American countries were dominated by house leasing
and tenancy. After World War II, the purchase of houses was on rise and
gradually became the predominant trade form in the market. However, nowadays tenancy
and selling of houses still co-exist in the market in these countries. Thanks
to the promotion of housing mortgage loans, ordinary residents are now able to
have access to the house purchase market. However, if the mortgage loans are
improperly dealt with, they could bring about financial crises such as the
crisis of the thrift and loan institutions in 1980s in the United States. Maintaining the co-existence of house tenancy and
selling is not only a method to satisfy the housing needs of the low-income
people, but also a prerequisite to maintain the free mobility of the workforce.
In order to create a certain kind of tenancy and leasing market for the housing
industry, and in order to ensure the housing mortgage loans be backed by
indisputable securities, the real estate developers must utilize equity
financing as the main form. As the real estate industry is a high-risk as well
as a high-return industry, the problem of matching risks and returns shall only
be better resolved with equity financing mode taking the dominant position.
According to information provided by the Report on China’s Real Estate Market 2003~2004, the leverage ratios of China’s real estate enterprises are relatively high. The
leverage ratios of the top five listed companies in Hong Kong are basically kept at a level between 30% to 40%, while those of
domestic real estate companies stand at around 75%. The report also shows that
among the 24.6% of the self-raised capital 13.3% belongs to self-owned capital.
Such a high leverage ratio could bring huge loss to debtors once the market
risks arise. According to the Report, the return on self-owned capital is
21.17%, which does not match the risk borne by debtors when compared to the
cost of financing. With the maturing of financial markets, the principle of
matching risks with returns shall be absorbed into the financing mode for real
estate industry, and it is an inevitable trend that the ratio of developers’
equity financing will be increased.
China’s economy is now in a transition period when
many reforms are not compatible with each other perfectly. When we put forward
the reform of housing commercialization and monetarization, the state reduced
or halted direct input into the housing industry but failed to open the equity-
financing channel to real estate developers. A multi-level capital market has
not developed not only to real estate developers but also to all the
enterprises, leading to the result that many enterprise flocked to get listed
in the stock market. If they did not succeed in the direct financing market but
have to develop, the financing burden thus completely falls on banks. In order
to support the housing monetarization reform and promote the development of the
real estate industry, the People’s Bank of China has issued a series of credit
policies to contribute to the development of real estate credit since 1998. The
rapid development of the real estate industry should be a benefactor of the
housing credit policy formulated by the PBC, otherwise the real estate industry
shall not be so sensitive to the adjustment of the PBC’ credit policy. However,
there should be a limit on risks borne by banks, otherwise the financial
stability could be threatened. The difference between bank credit and direct
financing goes as follows: bank loans are able to create purchasing powers,
which could lead to asset bubbles if improperly controlled; direct financing
brings about circulation of the realistic purchasing powers, which could
enhance fund utilization via efficient capital allocation. Therefore, it is an
urgent task to expand the direct financing channels after the central bank
adjusted the real estate credit policies in line with the needs of macro
economic control.
Given the current restrictions on financing via public
offerings on the part of real estate developers, private placements shall be a
possible approach worthwhile studying actively. The stipulation of “200
contracts” in the Provisional Rules on Entrusted Funds by Trust and
Investment Companies as well as the stipulation that “the issuance of
securities to specific objects that amount to more than 200 persons
accumulatively shall be regarded as public offering in the revised Securities
Law enacted on October 28 this year leaves room for privately-raised trust
funds, privately-offered stocks and bonds. The privately-raised trust funds can
be used for project development or real estate investment, i.e. real estate
purchasing. The privately-offered stocks can solve developers’ capital raising
problem to some extent.
xMortgagecompaniesloans Mortgage Companies Loans A A Forex Of Mortgage Companies Loans Szh 1 Mortgage Companies Loans Expand Financing Channels of l the Real Estate Industry and Develop a Win-win Situation for the Real Estate Industry and Financial Industry-中国人民银行p y Fap Mortgage Mortgage Companies Loans
cMortgagecompaniesloans Mortgage Companies Loans A A Forex Of Mortgage Companies Loans Szh 1 Mortgage Companies Loans Expand Financing Channels of l the Real Estate Industry and Develop a Win-win Situation for the Real Estate Industry and Financial Industry-中国人民银行a y c Loan Mortgage Companies Loans Mortgage Fast